Logo

Benchmarks

Measured performance across document formats

Benchmarks by language and file type

Performance benchmarks across languages and document types

Processing Speed

Throughput comparison • Higher is better

PDF
file
MB/S SPEED
553.14
AVG COMPETITOR
-

FASTER

-x

Memory Usage

RAM consumption • Lower is better

PDF
file

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

282.56MB

Tika

Benchmark process failed.

-MB
KREUZBERG
282.56MB
AVG COMPETITOR
-MB

LIGHTER

-x

Duration

Extraction time per document • Lower is better

PDF
file

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

23.30ms

Tika

Benchmark process failed.

-ms
KREUZBERG
23.30ms
AVG COMPETITOR
-ms

FASTER

-x

Quality Score

Extraction accuracy (F1 Score) • Higher is better

PDF
file

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

74.2%

Tika

Benchmark process failed.

-%
KREUZBERG
74.20%
AVG COMPETITOR
-%

ACCURACY

-x

Success Rate

Success rate • Higher is better

PDF
file
94.19%

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

0.01%

Tika

Cold Start

Framework initialization time • Lower is better

PDF
file

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

99ms

Pandoc

198ms

Tika

1502ms
KREUZBERG
98.52ms
AVG COMPETITOR
850.05ms

FASTER

8.6x

Installation Footprint

Framework installation size • Lower is better

PDF
file

Pandoc

189.78MB

Tika

259.40MB
KREUZBERG
0.00MB
AVG COMPETITOR
224.59MB

SMALLER

-x

CPU Usage

Processing PDF files • Real-time Replay

PDF
file

Live CPU Usage

0.0s / 25.0s

Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline

0%

Pandoc

No data
Tika

No data

Average CPU usage

CPU %

Framework Capabilities

Feature support comparison across frameworks

FrameworkOCR SUPPORTBATCH PROCESSINGASYNC SUPPORT
Kreuzberg Markdown Baseline
Pandoc
Tika

Download Benchmark Data

All raw benchmark results are publicly available. Download in JSON format for your own analysis.

We value your privacy

Kreuzberg uses cookies to improve your experience, personalize content, and analyze traffic. You can manage your preferences at any time.